Advance Materials - Process Optimization, Microstructure and Hardness of Additively Manufactured Co-Cr Aerospace Alloy
Abstract
In the current study, the effect of carefully designed Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) laser parameters on the
microstructure and hardness of Co-Cr alloy straight, thin-wall additively manufactured test coupons that are asbuilt or have undergone Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) was investigated. For enhanced productivity, it is important to
evaluate the relationship between energy density (ED) input (laser power, scan speed) and the microstructure
developed in the Co-Cr alloy coupons for an aerospace application. Both the High ED and Low ED input processing
laser parameters induce a higher percent (%) volume of defects in the as-built coupons when compared to the
manufacturer recommended benchmark parameters. However, after HIP, the % volume fraction of defects reduces
significantly, and the microstructure is homogenized. Furthermore, the strength of the test coupons manufactured
using the manufacturer recommended laser parameters is comparable to those obtained in the low ED input test
coupons after HIP; which invariably could be utilized to enhance productivity significantly. In addition, the surface
roughness of the Low ED input parameter coupons after HIP is similar to the coupons produced using the
manufacturer recommended laser parameters assessed with light optical magnification image evaluation. Hot
Isostatic Pressing is therefore an excellent post-processing method to reduce internal defects for a given range of
laser energy densities in metal additive manufacturing at increased build speeds.
References
wire-ARC additive manufacturing process. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 48(9), 4211-
4228.Atkinson, H.V., Davies, S. Fundamental aspects of hot isostatic pressing: An overview. Metallurgical
and Materials Transactions. A. 31 (12): (2000) p. 2981–300.
Baufeld, B., & Van der Biest, O. (2009). Mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V specimens produced by shaped metal
deposition. Science and technology of advanced materials, 10(1), 015008.
Choi, J., & Chang, Y. (2005). Characteristics of laser aided direct metal/material deposition process for tool
steel. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 45(4-5), 597-607.
Cleary, P. W., & Sawley, M. L. (2002). DEM modelling of industrial granular flows: 3D case studies and the effect of
particle shape on hopper discharge. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 26(2), 89-111.
Ding, D., Pan, Z., Cuiuri, D., & Li, H. (2015). Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components: technologies,
developments and future interests. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing
Technology, 81(1-4), 465-481.
Frazier, W. E. (2014). Metal additive manufacturing: a review. Journal of Materials Engineering and
Performance, 23(6), 1917-1928.
Gong, H., Rafi, K., Gu, H., Ram, G. J., Starr, T., & Stucker, B. (2015). Influence of defects on mechanical properties
of Ti–6Al–4 V components produced by selective laser melting and electron beam melting. Materials &
Design, 86, 545-554.
Karapatis, N. P., Egger, G., Gygax, P. E., & Glardon, R. (1999). Optimization of powder layer density in selective
laser sintering. In 1999 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium.
Kim, F. H., Moylan, S. P., Garboczi, E. J., & Slotwinski, J. A. (2017). Investigation of pore structure in cobalt chrome
additively manufactured parts using X-ray computed tomography and three-dimensional image
analysis. Additive Manufacturing, 17, 23-38.
Kinsella, M. E. (2008). Additive Manufacturing of Superalloys for Aerospace Applications (Preprint) (No. AFRL-RXWP-TP-2008-4318). AIR FORCE RESEARCH LAB WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH MATERIALS AND
MANUFACTURING DIRECTORATE.
Kong, C. Y., Carroll, P. A., Brown, P., & Scudamore, R. J. (2007, May). The effect of average powder particle size on
deposition efficiency, deposit height and surface roughness in the direct metal laser deposition process.
In 14th International Conference on Joining of Materials.
Lu, Q. Y., & Wong, C. H. (2018). Additive manufacturing process monitoring and control by non-destructive testing
techniques: challenges and in-process monitoring. Virtual and physical prototyping, 13(2), 39-48.
Marc, S. X marks the spot - find ideal process parameters for your AM parts. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/xmarks-spot-find-ideal-process-parameters-your-metal-marc-saunders.
Sankaranarayanan, S., Manickavasagam, K., Francis, G.C.W., Niaz, A.K. and GaryNg, K.L. (2016) Solid Freeform
Fabrication: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium – An
Additive Manufacturing Conference Reviewed Paper, 469-486.
Sharratt, B. M. (2015). Non-destructive techniques and technologies for qualification of additive manufactured
parts and processes. no. March.
Syed, W. U. H., Pinkerton, A. J., & Li, L. (2005). A comparative study of wire feeding and powder feeding in direct
diode laser deposition for rapid prototyping. Applied surface science, 247(1-4), 268-276.
Thompson, S. M., Bian, L., Shamsaei, N., & Yadollahi, A. (2015). An overview of Direct Laser Deposition for additive
manufacturing; Part I: Transport phenomena, modeling and diagnostics. Additive Manufacturing, 8, 36-62.
Williams, S. W., Martina, F., Addison, A. C., Ding, J., Pardal, G., & Colegrove, P. (2016). Wire+ arc additive
manufacturing. Materials Science and Technology, 32(7), 641-647.
Xue, L. and Islam, M.U. (2006). Specialists’ Meeting on Cost Effective Manufacture via Net Shape Processing
(NATO/RTO AVT-139), 15:1-14.
Zhang, Y., Wei, Z., Shi, L. and Xi, M. (2008). Characterization of laser powder deposited Ti–TiC composites and
functional gradient materials. Journal of materials processing technology. 206, 438–444.
Zhong, C., Gasser, A., Schopphoven, T., & Poprawe, R. (2015). Experimental study of porosity reduction in high
deposition-rate Laser Material Deposition. Optics & Laser Technology, 75, 87-92.
