An Investigation on the Use of Expanded Polystyrene as a Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate in Concrete

U.T. Igba; S. O.  Ehikhuenmen; S. O.  Oyebisi; N.O.  Oloyede

U.T. Igba Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria
S. O. Ehikhuenmen Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
S. O. Oyebisi Department of Civil Engineering, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria
N.O. Oloyede Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria

Keywords: Compressive strength, Expanded polystyrene concrete, Fine aggregate

Abstract

The construction sector in Nigeria is looking for alternative materials due to the consistent increase in the cost of building materials. Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) material derived from the distillation process of crude oil. It is 100% recyclable, bacteria and age resistant, lightweight with low moisture absorption and possess an excellent cushioning property. This paper focuses on the use of EPS as partial replacement of quarry dust in concrete to carry light loads. Five replacement increments were compared at 0%, 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75% and 1.0% for EPS with mix ratio of 1:2:4 and water-cement ratio of 0.55. Slump, compaction factor and, compressive strength tests were conducted using slump and compaction factor test apparatus on fresh and cured concretes to determine how the incorporation of EPS as a replacement of fine aggregate would affect the development of strength in the mixes. The workability result of the slump and compaction factor test value decreased as the percentage replacement of EPS increased from 0 to 1 % leading to a less workable concrete since the increment in percentage replacement led to a reduction in the bonding property of the concrete. The optimum blend was at 0.25 % replacement of fine aggregate with EPS. The replacement of EPS showed a positive application as an alternative material in building non-structural members. It was concluded that the expanded polystyrene concrete (EPC) can best be used in non-structural applications like solid ground floors and lightweight concrete in ambient temperature.

References

Aaboe, R. (1987). 13 years of experience with expanded polystyrene as a lightweight fill material in road embankments. Norwegian Road Research Laboratory Publication 61: 21–27.
Aaboe, R. and Frydenlund, T. E. (2011). 40 years of experience with the use of EPS geofoam blocks in road construction. Proceedings of the fourth International Conference on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications, Lillestrom, Norway.
Batayneh, M., Marie, I. and Asi, I. (2007). Use of selected waste materials in concrete mixes, Waste Management, 27(12): 1870–1876.
BS 1377-2 (1990). British standard methods of test for soil for engineering purposes: classification tests. British Standard Institution, London.
BS 882 (1992). Specification for aggregates from natural sources for concrete. British Standard Institution, London.
BS EN 12350-2: (2000). A Method for Determination of Slump. British Standard Institution, London.
BS EN 12350-4: (2000). Testing fresh concrete. Degree of compactability. British Standard Institution, London.
BS EN 12350-6: (2009). Testing Fresh Concrete Density of Test Specimens. British Standard Institution, London.
BS EN 12390-3: (2009). Testing Hardened Concrete. Compressive Strength of Test Specimens. British Standard Institution, London.
Ede, A. N. and Ogundiran, A. (2014). Thermal Behaviour and Admissible Compressive Strength of Expanded Polystyrene Wall Panels of Varying Thickness,” Current Trends in Technology and Science, 3(2): 110 -117.
Elias, V., Welsh, J., Warren, J. and Lukas, R. (1999). Ground Improvement Technical Summaries. DTFH61-93-R-00145, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. DOT, Office of Technology Application.
Expanded Polystyrene Australia, EPSA (2016). www.epsa.org.au International Organization for Standardization. ISO Guide 73:2009 Risk Management vocabulary http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=44651
Horvath, J. S. (1995). Geofoam geosynthetic. Horvath Engineering, P.C., Scarsdale, New Work, USA.
Kuhail, Z. (2003). Mechanical Properties of Polystyrene-Lightweight Concrete. Journal of The Islamic University of Gaza, 11(2): 93-114.
Mehta, P. K. and Burrows, R. W. (2001). Building Durable Structures in the 21st Century. Concrete International, 23(3): 57-63.
Nawy, E. G. (2008). Concrete Construction Engineering Handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420007657
Tomasz, M., Joanna, N. and Damian, B. (2019). Application of EPS Geofoam to a Soil–Steel Bridge to reduce Seismic Excitations. Geosciences, 9(10): 448.
Raj, R., Nayak, M. K., Akbari, M. A. and Saha, P. (2014). Prospects of expanded polystyrene sheet as green building material. International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 5(2): 145-150.
Saradhi, B. D., Ganesh, B. K. and Wee, T. H. (2005). Properties of lightweight expanded polystyrene aggregate concretes containing fly ash. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(6): 1218–1223.
Stark, T. D., Arellano, D., Horvath, J. S. and Leshchinsky, D. (2004). Guideline and Recommended Standard for Geofoam Applications in Highway Embankments; NCHRP REPORT 529; Transportation Research Board of the National Academies: Washington, DC, USA.
Suhad, M. A., Dhamya, G., Maan, H., and Dunya, K. (2016). Effective replacement of fine aggregates by expanded polystyrene beads in concrete. International Journal of Engineering Research and Science and Technology, 5(3): 45-53.